Galton Institute Home Page March 1997 Newsletter Contents Newsletter Index

Population Crises and Population Cycles

7. North-Western Europe: The Breakthrough And After

Claire Russell and W.M. S. Russell

In the hydraulic societies, with their huge population densities, we have seen that the effects of the crises were cumulative, causing a growing load of stress culture and the decline of civilisation. In North-Western Europe, with its low population densities (until the 19th century), it was the effects of the relief periods and renaissances that accumulated, causing continuous progress even during the crises and eventually the technological breakthrough. Figure 1 does indeed show that the rate of technological progress stepped up during relief periods and slowed down during crises, including that of the 20th century, which is living on the capital of the previous relief period (Table 1). But Figure 1 also shows that progress acquired a momentum that carried it through even the crisis periods, and in this region alone we can study this continuous progress, the fruit of low population density.

The relation between population cycles and technology is brought out roughly in this graph, based on figures prepared (for quite different reasons) in 1928 by the Executive Secretary of a United States Temporary National Economic Committee. Probably nearly all refer to inventions in North-Western Europe and its extensions overseas. Centuries are, of course, arbitrary divisions, not perfectly corresponding with crises and relief periods (see Table 3 of the sixth paper of the series).  And in the light of recent research, the inventions of the 12th century have been underestimated here. Still, it is possible to see upsurges of invention (more than doubling the previous century's score) in the relief periods of the 12th, 15th and 18-19th centuries, and slowing down, or actual decline, in the crises - 13th-14th, 16th-17th and 20th centuries. The number for the 20th century was extrapolated (to 100) from the 27 inventions listed up to 1927. Our century has certainly been living on the inventive capital of the 19th century - see Table 1 of this paper.

The renaissances (see Table 3 of the sixth paper in the series) were marked by higher real wages and general standard of living (see Figure 3 of the first paper), greater social mobility, greater freedom, splendid cultural achievements, and improved amenities of life - for instance, the splendid medieval system of public baths and lavatories which was repeatedly broken down during crises, with obvious repercussions on health. The simple sequence of Table 3 of the sixth paper (and Figure 1 of this) is misleading, because population cycles were staggered in different parts of the region. In the mid-14th century, the Kingdom of Bohemia (modern Czech Republic) was enjoying a renaissance, with a flourishing university, a Holy Roman Emperor, high real wages, and improved peasant rights; hence it scarcely suffered at all from the first visit of the Black Death, which was reducing the population of the rest of North-Western Europe by about one-third. Over-population, with all its consequences, developed in Bohemia later in the century, causing much higher mortality than elsewhere when the Black Death returned in about 1380, and eventually a terrible civil war (1419-37) when the rest of the region was beginning to enjoy the Early Modern Renaissance. This began in the Low Countries, Southern Germany, and especially Northern Italy. France, the most seriously overpopulated country in the region, had suffered so severely in the Medieval crisis that her renaissance was delayed, and it was soon interrupted by the religious wars (1559-93). The English renaissance was interrupted by a short sharp crisis, with a serious epidemic, in the 1550s, which so reduced the population it ushered in the glorious Elizabethan flowering. Finally, at the height of the Early Modern crisis elsewhere, the Dutch had a renaissance of ancient Northern Mediterranean type, based on their temporary supremacy in world trade. But through all these vicissitudes, technological progress continued throughout the region.

Table 1: Anticipations, 1796-1914

Date (A.D.)

Inventions and Discoveries

1796-1857

Cayley’s aeronautic theory

1822-1848

Babbage’s computers

1843

Lady Lovelace’s computer programming (with ideas more advanced than those used in the first IBM computer of 1944)

1856

Celluloid, the first plastic

1880s

Tsiolkovsky’s space flight theory

1884

Rayon, the first artificial fibre

1896

Becquerel discovers radioactivity

1897

J J Thomson discovers the electron

1900

Planck announces quantum theory

1902

Marya Sklodovska (Madame Curie) isolates radium

 

Rutherford and Soddy discuss possibility of splitting atom

1904

Thermionic valve, the first electronic device

1905

Einstein’s special relativity theory

This table amply demonstrates that the later 20th century, the modern population crisis period, is living on the inventive capital of the previous period of relief from population pressure. The Russian Tsiolkovsky and the Pole Sklodovska are examples of individuals from North-Eastern Europe who made major contributions to the technological breakthrough, as noted in the sixth paper of this series.

In the Roman Empire, the only important labour-saving devices were the animal-powered Gallic reaping machine, used and probably invented in North-Western Europe, and the vertical water-mill, also used mainly there, and in any case on a tiny scale - a few dozens altogether. In early medieval North-Western Europe, water-mills were legion: 5624 were recorded in England in 1086, and at the same time France may have had 20,000. ‘This hydraulic energy was equivalent to that which could be deployed by one-quarter of the adult population of the kingdom’ (Debeir et al., 1991). Some time before 1137, the English invented the rotating vertical wind-mill: there were at least 56 in England by 1200, and in the next century they diffused all over North-Western Europe. Tidal mills appeared in the 12th century, steam bellows in the 13th. The mills were used for grinding corn, forging iron, tanning, fulling, making paper, sawing, brewing, polishing armour, and crushing anything from olives to ore. Many of these uses depended on the invention of the cam, which the Chinese had used only for hulling rice, and the Northern Mediterranean peoples only for making toys. The mechanisation of fulling has been called as important a development as the mechanisation of spinning and weaving in the 18th century. During the medieval crisis, fear of unemployment caused some opposition to fulling mills, but nothing could stop their advance.

Table 2: The Marriage Pattern of North-Western Europe

A. Comparison in Space: Selected Countries (Data from Hajnal, 1965)

Country

Date (A.D.)

Percentage of Women still Single at Ages:

   

20-24

45-49

North-Western Europe

1900-01

   

Austria

 

66

13

Britain

 

73

15

Sweden

 

80

19

Others

     

Ceylon

1946

29

3

Korea

1930

2

0

Morocco (Moslems)

1952

8

2

B: Comparison in Time: British Royal and Ducal Families (Data from Hollingsworth, 1957)

Period of Birth (A.D.)

 

Percentage of Women still Single at Ages:

   

20

50

1330-1479

 

42

7

1480-1679

 

45

6

1680-1729

 

75

17

1730-1779

 

76

14

1780-1829

 

89

12

1830-1879

 

80

22

‘In the different states of modern Europe, it appears that the positive checks to population [high death-rates] have prevailed less, and the preventive checks [low birth-rates] more, than in ancient times, and in the more uncultivated parts of the world ... In almost all the more improved countries of modern Europe, the principal check ... is the prudential restraint on marriage ... the greater number of persons who remain unmarried, or marry late’ (Robert Malthus, 1830). Modern research fully confirms Malthus, as the tables show, especially for North-Western Europe (‘the more improved countries’). The pattern seems to have become established in the 17th century. In ordinary families (as opposed to the upper-class ones in Table B), the age of women at marriage was particularly high during the later 17th and earlier 18th centuries, the precious period of almost stable population in North-Western Europe that prepared the way for the industrial revolution.

Medieval technologists enjoyed great prestige. There was a widespread individualism and thirst for personal glory new in world history. In the Gothic cathedrals, thousands of craftsmen proudly signed their work. In classical Athens, the greatest of all Greek sculptors, Phidias, died in prison, accused of blasphemously sneaking a self-portrait into a religious composition. In medieval France, with complete impunity, the great sculptor Gislebertus carved his name just beneath the feet of Christ in the centre of the West facade of Autun Cathedral.

The figure shows the sudden huge expansion of the British textile industry (measured by imports of raw materials), as a result of the labour-saving inventions listed in Table 3. Some twelve years later, the iron industry expanded in turn. As the cotton industry grew,  'it created a greatly-increased demand for steam engines, machines, transport, dyes, fuel and building materials. The almost explosive development of the textile trade therefore led to a rapid expansion in the industries which produced these things, most notably the iron industry'. Thus 'cotton effectively led the whole of the British economy into the industrial revolution' (Pacey, 1974).

‘In the 12th and 13th centuries, .... there was born .... a new conscious empirical science’ (Crombie, 1969). Scientists and technologists worked together. Pierre de Maricourt, author of a brilliant study of magnetism, was a near neighbour and probably friend of the versatile technologist Villard de Honnecourt. The development of clockwork was a joint achievement of science and technology. During the population crises, there was some censorship of science, and some scientists suffered seriously (Roger Bacon, William of Ockham, Cardano, Harriot and Galileo). But the censorship was nothing like as bad as that in the population crisis of late fifth-century (BC) Athens, or in the Islamic world from the 16th to the 19th centuries, when virtually all scientific activity was banned.

Table 3: Some Inventions and Discoveries of the Industrial Revolution

A. 1690-1790

Date (A.D.)

Textiles

S=spinning

W=weaving

Steam Power

Iron and Steel

Machine Tools

Electricity

1690

 

Papin’s Theory

     

1702

 

Savery’s Engine

     

1712

 

Newcomen’s Engine

     

1717

   

A. Darby I makes cast iron with coke

   

1733

W: Kay’s flying shuttle

S: Wyatt’s machine

       

1750s

   

This method in wide use

   

1764

S: Hargreaves’ hand-powered jenny

       

1769

S: Arkwright’s horse-powered jenny

Watt’s separate condenser

     

1771

S: Arkwrights’ water-powered spinning mill

       

1774

     

Wilkinson’s boring mill

 

1775

 

Boulton-Watt partnership

     

1779

S: Crompton’s mule (fine spinning)

 

A Darby III and Wilkinson, first iron bridge

   

1781

 

Watt’s rotative engine

     

1784

   

Cort makes wrought iron with coal

   

1785

W: Cartwright’s power loom

       
 

Steam-powered coarse spinning

     

1790

Steam-powered fine (mule) spinning

     

B. 1791-1880

1792

S: Kelly’s self-acting mule

       

1801

 

Trevithick’s high-pressure engine

     

1802-7

     

Maudslay’s Portsmouth Block set

 

1804

 

Trevithick’s locomotive

     

1821

       

Faraday’s motor

1831

       

Faraday’s dynamo

1841

     

Whitworth’s standard screw thread

 

1850s

W: Power loom widely adopted

       

1860

   

Bessemer’s converter steel production

 

Industrial dynamos

1868

   

Siemen’s open-hearth steel production

   

1873

       

Industrial motors

1878

       

Swan’s filament lamp

In the 14th century, block printing reached North-Western Europe, ultimately from China. The Chinese had also invented movable type, but this was of little importance until combined with the alphabetic scripts of Europe. But between 1439 and 1450 Johann Gensfleisch zur Laden zum Gutenberg reinvented movable type for printing books, and mechanised printing by devising the press. This supreme invention gave science the momentum to advance spectacularly right through the Early Modern population crisis, and ensured that when the Long Renaissance began science and technology were more closely integrated than ever: Newton’s discoveries about light and colour were reported to the Royal Society in 1672, and by 1704 they were being applied, by James Christopher le Blon, to the problem of printing in colour.

Between 1670 and 1750, North-Western Europe enjoyed the priceless gift of a near-stable population. Malthus discovered the reason: the region had achieved (especially during this period) unprecedentedly low birth-rates, thanks to a change in the pattern of marriage (Table 2). The resulting labour shortage in the British textile industry led to explicit demands for labour-saving inventions (e.g. in 1733, 1757, 1764, 1772, 1792, 1800) and even the offer of prizes for them (1760s). The demand was met by a number of new devices (Table 3), and the expanding textile industry launched the industrial revolution (Figure 2, Table 3). Unfortunately, the birth-rates did not keep pace with the lowering death-rates, and populations grew again, producing an incipient crisis - the Napoleonic Wars, unemployment and cheap labour after 1815 slowing down the revolution, and famine in the Hungry (Eighteen-) Forties. A temporary solution like that of the ancient Northern Mediterranean kept the Long Renaissance going until 1914, and made possible the second phase of the revolution (steel and electricity, Table 3): between 1851 and 1931 eighteen million people emigrated from the British Isles, and seventeen from the rest of North-Western Europe, and by the 1870s Britain was importing more than half her wheat. But birth rates continued higher than death rates, and in the appalling population explosion of the 20th century North-Western Europe reached hydraulic population densities (see Figure 1 and Tables 2 and 3 of the sixth paper), and all the precious benefits of low density were thrown away. The sad results we shall consider in a later paper, when we come to the present world population crisis.